[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f32a649e-3563-2485-234e-640f9dace105@omp.ru>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:56:29 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sh: avoid using IRQ0 on SH3/4
On 6/11/23 8:28 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
[...]
>>>> IRQ0 is no longer returned by platform_get_irq() and its ilk -- they now
>>>> return -EINVAL instead. However, the kernel code supporting SH3/4 based
>>>> SoCs still maps the IRQ #s starting at 0 -- modify that code to start the
>>>> IRQ #s from 16 instead.
>>>>
>>>> The patch should mostly affect the AP-SH4A-3A/AP-SH4AD-0A boards as they
>>>> indeed are using IRQ0 for the SMSC911x compatible Ethernet chip...
>>>
>>> Do you mind if I remove the ellipsis at the end of this sentence when I merge
>>> this later today? I think it makes no sense from a grammatical point of view.
>>
>> No, I don't mind. :-)
>
> Applied to my for-next branch.
Note that this was positioned as a fix.
Where is your tree, BTW? :-)
> Thanks,
> Adrian
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists