[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKFNMomCUnaB3_3chQm4P8devx2NwAp2hMpYfbyaHKyO2WLEkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 12:59:39 +0900
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+53369d11851d8f26735c@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
axboe@...nel.dk, dsterba@...e.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
wqu@...e.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [nilfs?] general protection fault in nilfs_clear_dirty_page
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:30 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 02:18:29PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > syzbot has bisected this issue to:
> >
> > commit 4a445b7b6178d88956192c0202463063f52e8667
> > Author: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
> > Date: Sat Aug 13 08:06:53 2022 +0000
> >
> > btrfs: don't merge pages into bio if their page offset is not contiguous
>
> I can't see how that btrfs commit would affect nilfs2..
Yeah, I think this bisection result is wrong.
I have already posted a bug-fix patch titled "nilfs2: prevent general
protection fault in nilfs_clear_dirty_page()"
for this issue.
Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists