lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:15:10 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Ricard Wanderlof <ricardw@...s.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@...s.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <kernel@...s.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regmap: Add debugfs file for forcing field writes


On Tue, 13 Jun 2023, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 01:42:27PM +0200, Waqar Hameed wrote:
> > `_regmap_update_bits()` checks if the current register value differs
> > from the new value, and only writes to the register if they differ. When
> >
> > +	/*
> > +	 * This could interfere with driver operation. Therefore, don't provide
> > +	 * any real compile time configuration option for this feature. One will
> > +	 * have to modify the source code directly in order to use it.
> > +	 */
> > +#undef REGMAP_ALLOW_FORCE_WRITE_FIELD_DEBUGFS
> > +#ifdef REGMAP_ALLOW_FORCE_WRITE_FIELD_DEBUGFS
> > +	debugfs_create_bool("force_write_field", 0600, map->debugfs,
> > +			    &map->force_write_field);
> > +#endif
> 
> Please no, that means this will never ever ever get used, and if it
> happens to break the build or runtime, no one will ever notice it.
> 
> If you need this for your device/tree/distro, great, just keep it as an
> out-of-tree patch with the huge header "NEVER ENABLE THIS IN A REAL
> SYSTEM" or something like that.

The ordinary only-write-if-bits-have-changed behavior of 
_regmap_update_bits would seem to be mostly an optimization to minimize 
the number of writes to a device. The way it is normally used in the code, 
it's not easy to predict when it in fact will result in a write, because 
the whole idea of a function like this is that a driver doesn't have to 
keep track of which bits are actually set or not, or else the function 
would not be useful in the first place.

I can understand that enabling a write-always behavior results in a 
different behavior on the associated bus (e.g. I2C), but in the end it 
shouldn't affect the functionality of the peripheral device any more than 
rearranging driver code to perform regmap writes in a different order, 
which might also lead to fewer or more bus writes.

It seems I'm clearly in the wrong here, so there must be some scenario 
I've missed. It just doesn't seem that dangerous; it's a debug 
functionality after all.

/Ricard
-- 
Ricard Wolf Wanderlof                           ricardw(at)axis.com
Axis Communications AB, Lund, Sweden            www.axis.com
Phone +46 46 272 2016                           Fax +46 46 13 61 30

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ