[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb8ef8e7-15d2-4fc3-8d9b-4edf1b3bced1@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:23:27 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Yingkun Meng <mengyingkun@...ngson.cn>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [ PATCH v2 3/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: Add support for Loongson
audio card
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 03:29:33PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 02:54:36PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > are also important to the audio configuration. A card binding describes
> > the interconections between the devices in the system and provides
> > identification information for the audio subsystem. This system level
> > audio integration is a physical thing that can be pointed at that
> > requires real software control.
> The bit you were responding to with that was a disingenuous question.
> Probably not fair of me to ask one of a non-native speaker like that,
> when all I wanted to know was whether it was appropriate not to add
> a more specific compatible, or whether this was something invariant.
I don't think that's particularly useful - you'd end up adding a
compatible for every single board which we've got no real intention of
adding except in the cases where we end up being able to merge a more
specific machine driver into a generic one. It'd be more likely to lead
to bikeshedding than anything useful I think.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists