linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in pinmux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZIiMsUmhwRYcQaXu@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 18:35:13 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in
 pinmux_select()

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 04:30:44PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > …, because asked lenght …
> 
> * Are there any chances to avoid a typo in such a change description?

Not anymore as explained in the other email, but thanks for pointing this out.

> * Was a cover letter accidentally omitted?

What do you want to see in such cover letter? How can it be helpful?
(Note that these are rhetorical towards this change, as it's already
 in the non-rebased branch)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko