linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: Fix LLCC reg property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:38:15 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: Fix LLCC reg property



On 13.06.2023 00:06, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The LLCC binding and driver was recently corrected to handle the stride
> varying between platforms. Switch to the new format to ensure accesses
> are done in the right place.
> 
> Fixes: 8575f197b077 ("arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce the SC8180x platform")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi
> index 88015742315b..3de62e26d56a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi
> @@ -2541,8 +2541,11 @@ usb_sec_dpphy: dp-phy@...f200 {
>  
>  		system-cache-controller@...0000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-llcc";
> -			reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
> -			reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
> +			reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x09280000 0 0x50000>,
Is there anything inbetween these register ranges?
Should they be 0x80000-long?

Konrad
> +			      <0 0x09300000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x09380000 0 0x50000>,
> +			      <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
> +			reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc2_base",
> +				    "llcc3_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  		};
>