lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230613-library-enigmatic-267396f84d78@spud>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:44:58 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, sre@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: power: reset: atmel,sama5d2-shdwc:
 convert to yaml

On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:09:24PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 08/06/2023 at 18:49, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:38:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > 
> > > For reference, anything done by Arm, Linaro or NVIDIA employees is
> > > okay to relicense to dual license.
> > Ah cool, that's good to know, thanks.
> > Perhaps I should try to get a similar edict issued for Microchip ones.
> > @Nicolas, does that sound reasonable?
> 
> Well, we can work it out internally, indeed. But is there a public statement
> about this somewhere?

You mean, is there a public statement about Arm/Linaro/Nvidia being okay
with relicensing bindings as dual license?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ