[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230613192317.lsk5nqo6vkhnhz52@mobilestation>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:23:17 +0300
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] device property: Implement device_is_compatible()
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 06:14:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 06:14:30PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:45:08PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 06:48:59PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Some users want to use the struct device pointer to see if the
> > > > device is compatible in terms of Open Firmware specifications,
> > > > i.e. if it has a 'compatible' property and it matches to the
> > > > given value. Provide inline helper for the users.
> > >
> > > IMO much useful wrapper. Thanks for the patch.
> > > Reviewed-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
> >
> > There is a v3. Do you mind to tag it as well?
>
> Ah, and thank you for review! Appreciate it.
Always welcome.) I've resent the tags for the patches 2 and 3. Patch 1
is out of my competence, sorry.
-Serge(y)
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists