[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202306131244.E8DF4CA166@keescook>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:46:29 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, nicolas@...sle.eu,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
trix@...hat.com, ojeda@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, dennis@...nel.org,
tj@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com, apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com,
dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
john.johansen@...onical.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, ravi.bangoria@....com, error27@...il.com,
luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/57] locking: Introduce __cleanup() based
infrastructure
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:55:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:07:16AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/cleanup.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +#ifndef __LINUX_GUARDS_H
> > +#define __LINUX_GUARDS_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * DEFINE_FREE(name, type, free):
> > + * simple helper macro that defines the required wrapper for a __free()
> > + * based cleanup function. @free is an expression using '_T' to access
> > + * the variable.
> > + *
> > + * __free(name):
> > + * variable attribute to add a scoped based cleanup to the variable.
> > + *
>
> no_free_ptr(var):
> like a non-atomic xchg(var, NULL), such that the cleanup
> function will be inhibited -- provided it sanely deals with a
> NULL value.
>
> > + * return_ptr(p):
> > + * returns p while inhibiting the __free().
> > + *
> > + * Ex.
> > + *
> > + * DEFINE_FREE(kfree, void *, if (_T) kfree(_T))
> > + *
> > + * struct obj *p = kmalloc(...);
>
> That should obviously have been:
>
> struct obj *p __free(kfree) = kmalloc(...);
Okay, good. I noticed that too. :)
I also didn't see any users of the kfree helpers (maybe I missed them?)
Maybe add at least one conversion just to have an example conversion for
it too?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists