linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] dt-bindings: rtc: isl12022: add #clock-cells property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:25:23 +0200
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] dt-bindings: rtc: isl12022: add #clock-cells
 property

On 13/06/2023 21.10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/06/2023 15:00, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:

>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/intersil,isl12022.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/intersil,isl12022.yaml
>> index d5d3a687a34d..a9ef68b5fdcd 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/intersil,isl12022.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/intersil,isl12022.yaml
>> @@ -11,6 +11,13 @@ maintainers:
>>  
>>  allOf:
>>    - $ref: rtc.yaml#
>> +  # If #clock-cells is present, interrupts must not be present
>> +  - if:
>> +      required:
>> +        - '#clock-cells'
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        interrupts: false
> 
> Entire allOf block should be like in example-schema, so before
> unevaluatedProperties. Please put it in correct place in your first
> patch so here it does not have to be moved.
>

OK. That first patch was basically a copy-paste of c690048ed59b, and
e.g. ingenic,rtc.yaml has a similar non-trivial allOf block between
maintainers and properties. Is there somehow I could have known it
should be right before unevaluatedProperties?

Rasmus