[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230613162701.3730af5d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:27:01 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
William White <chwhite@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/11] rtla: Add --house-keeping option
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 16:21:35 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 6/12/23 16:06, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 18:12:16 +0200
> > Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> To avoid having rtla interfering with the measurement threads, add an
> >> option for the user to set the CPUs in which rtla should run. For
> >> instance:
> >>
> >> # rtla timerlat top -H 0 -C 1-7
> > Isn't it '-c 1-7' instead of '-C', because -C is for cgroup name?
>
> Ooops, you are right.
>
Unless something else comes up, I updated the change log here.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists