[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230613204855.bm4wxneamkd76heq@intel.intel>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:48:55 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Marge Yang <marge.yang@...synaptics.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david.chiu@...synaptics.com,
derek.cheng@...synaptics.com, sam.tsai@...aptics.com,
vincent.huang@...synaptics.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Input: synaptics-rmi4- Add a new feature for Forepad.
Hi Marge,
[...]
> +static irqreturn_t rmi_f21_attention(int irq, void *ctx)
> +{
> + struct rmi_function *fn = ctx;
> + struct f21_data *f21 = dev_get_drvdata(&fn->dev);
> + int error;
> +
> + error = rmi_read_block(fn->rmi_dev,
> + fn->fd.data_base_addr+RMI_F21_FORCE_CLICK_OFFSET,
> + f21->data_regs, 1);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(&fn->dev,
> + "%s: Failed to read f21 data registers: %d\n",
> + __func__, error);
> + return IRQ_RETVAL(error);
> + }
> +
> + if (!!(f21->data_regs[0] & RMI_f21_FORCE_CLICK))
no need for double negation here.
Andi
> + input_report_key(f21->input, f21->key_code, true);
> + else
> + input_report_key(f21->input, f21->key_code, false);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists