lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230613210529.552098-1-lyude@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:05:28 -0400
From:   Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
To:     nouveau-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA
        GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS), linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Fix drm_dp_remove_payload() invocation

We changed the semantics for this in:

e761cc20946a ("drm/display/dp_mst: Handle old/new payload states in drm_dp_remove_payload()")

But I totally forgot to update this properly in nouveau. So, let's do that.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
index 5bb777ff13130..1637e08b548c2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
@@ -909,15 +909,19 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
 	struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(msto->encoder.dev);
 	struct nv50_mstc *mstc = msto->mstc;
 	struct nv50_mstm *mstm = mstc->mstm;
-	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
+	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *old_mst_state;
+	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload, *old_payload;
 
 	NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto prepare\n", msto->encoder.name);
 
+	old_mst_state = drm_atomic_get_old_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
+
 	payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, mstc->port);
+	old_payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(old_mst_state, mstc->port);
 
 	// TODO: Figure out if we want to do a better job of handling VCPI allocation failures here?
 	if (msto->disabled) {
-		drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, payload, payload);
+		drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, old_payload, payload);
 
 		nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, 0, 0, 0, 0);
 	} else {
-- 
2.40.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ