[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a09a674-342e-b197-aee7-980de410e970@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:05:33 +0200
From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
CC: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@....com>,
Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: stm32: use correct format strings on 64-bit
Hi Arnd
On 6/12/23 16:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, at 16:10, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
>
>>> ddata->rsc_va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
>>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ddata->rsc_va)) {
>>> - dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
>>> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%x\n",
>>> &rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
>>
>> What about cast the RSC_TBL_SIZE define instead to ensure to be independent from
>> the arch and to match with the use of RSC_TBL_SIZE?
>>
>> #define RSC_TBL_SIZE ((size_t)1024)
>
> I have no objection to that, but I don't see it doing anything good either,
> as this is a constant value that will always work.
>
> Arnd
The kernel robot shot me for my STM32MP25 PR due to this issue. Do I
have to resend something ?
Thanks
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists