[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230613101859.lwqlwa4t72sthvwk@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:18:59 +0300
From: "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"bagasdotme@...il.com" <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Shahar, Sagi" <sagis@...gle.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"imammedo@...hat.com" <imammedo@...hat.com>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 11/20] x86/virt/tdx: Fill out TDMRs to cover all TDX
memory regions
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:10:39PM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 17:33 +0300, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:33:58AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Maybe not even a pr_warn(), but something that's a bit ominous and has a
> > > > chance of getting users to act.
> > >
> > > Sorry I am not sure how to do. Could you give some suggestion?
> >
> > Maybe something like this would do?
> >
> > I'm struggle with the warning message. Any suggestion is welcome.
>
> I guess it would be helpful to print out the actual consumed TDMRs?
>
> pr_warn("consumed TDMRs reaching limit: %d used (out of %d)\n",
> tdmr_idx, tdmr_list->max_tdmrs);
It is off-by-one. It supposed to be tdmr_idx + 1.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists