[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIhddcdk001hcJgU@debian>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:13:41 +0100
From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.184-rc1 review
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:25:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.184 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230511):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3913
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3914
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists