[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a838693e-e441-2ea2-937a-5cad9a5cd512@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:57:22 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
Gokul krishna Krishnakumar <quic_gokukris@...cinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Fix split image detection
On 13/06/2023 00:58, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The enhanced detection introduced in commit '210d12c8197a ("soc: qcom:
> mdt_loader: Enhance split binary detection")' requires that all segments
> lies within the file on disk.
>
> But the Qualcomm firmware files consistently has a BSS-like segment at
> the end, with a p_offset aligned to the next 4k boundary. As the p_size
> is 0 and there's nothing to load, the image is not padded to cover this
> (empty) segment.
>
> Ignore zero-sized segments when determining if the image is split, to
> avoid this problem.
>
> Fixes: 210d12c8197a ("soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Enhance split binary detection")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> # qrb5165-rb5
W/o this patch loading mbn files is broken.
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
> index 9418993a3a92..6f177e46fa0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
> @@ -275,6 +275,14 @@ static bool qcom_mdt_bins_are_split(const struct firmware *fw, const char *fw_na
> phdrs = (struct elf32_phdr *)(ehdr + 1);
>
> for (i = 0; i < ehdr->e_phnum; i++) {
> + /*
> + * The size of the MDT file is not padded to include any
> + * zero-sized segments at the end. Ignore these, as they should
> + * not affect the decision about image being split or not.
> + */
> + if (!phdrs[i].p_filesz)
> + continue;
> +
> seg_start = phdrs[i].p_offset;
> seg_end = phdrs[i].p_offset + phdrs[i].p_filesz;
> if (seg_start > fw->size || seg_end > fw->size)
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists