[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25a8daec-e1c4-2164-c210-4ee6b9924c99@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 21:25:02 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>, xiang@...nel.org,
chao@...nel.org, huyue2@...lpad.com, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/5] erofs: unify inline/shared xattr iterators for
listxattr/getxattr
On 2023/6/13 15:41, Jingbo Xu wrote:
...
> +
> +int erofs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, int index,
> + const char *name,
> + void *buffer, size_t buffer_size)
I changed these line above into:
int erofs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, int index, const char *name,
void *buffer, size_t buffer_size)
> +{
> + int ret;
...
> ssize_t erofs_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
> @@ -568,8 +523,9 @@ ssize_t erofs_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
I also move erofs_listxattr definition into a line (since it's just
80 chars).
Otherwise it looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists