[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <449d07d9-5538-4f36-83a0-3a81a9ab9ea2@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:54:36 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Yingkun Meng <mengyingkun@...ngson.cn>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [ PATCH v2 3/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: Add support for Loongson
audio card
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 01:46:41PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> So it is entirely a software construct? Why does it need a dt-binding
> then? Your commit message says the controller is present on the device!
A typical embedded (or power efficient laptop) audio design will consist
of multiple devices connected together (frequently via non-control
buses) together with system level passive components and plastics which
are also important to the audio configuration. A card binding describes
the interconections between the devices in the system and provides
identification information for the audio subsystem. This system level
audio integration is a physical thing that can be pointed at that
requires real software control.
Like I said before please look at the existing audio card bindings.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists