[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230614111212.4e33bfbc@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:12:12 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...a.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Jackie Liu <liu.yun@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ftrace: Show all functions with addresses in
available_filter_functions_addrs
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 16:14:19 +0200
Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com> wrote:
> FYI I did some perf meassurements and the speedup is not substantial :-\
>
> looks like the symbols resolving to addresses we do in kernel for kprobe_multi
> link is more faster/cheaper than I thought
The symbol lookup is supposed to be fast, but it's not "free", whereas this
is "free". I didn't expect a big speedup.
-- Steve
>
> but still there is 'some' speedup and we will get rid of the extra
> /proc/kallsyms parsing, so I think it's still worth it to have the
> new file
Powered by blists - more mailing lists