lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2023 16:25:05 +0100
From:   Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...valent.com>
To:     Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc:     andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, hemanthmalla@...il.com,
        joe@...d.net.nz, john.fastabend@...il.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
        mykolal@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        sdf@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, song@...nel.org,
        willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] net: remove duplicate reuseport_lookup functions

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 7:57 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
>
>                         else {
>                                 result = sk;
>                         }
>
> The assignment to result below is buggy.  Let's say SO_REUSEPROT group
> have TCP_CLOSE and TCP_ESTABLISHED sockets.

I'm not very familiar with SO_REUSEPORT, I assumed (incorrectly
probably) that such a group would only ever have TCP_CLOSE in UDP case
and TCP_LISTENING in TCP case. Can you explain how I could end up in
this situation?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ