[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230614152721.eep5ip726ump2kpe@mercury.elektranox.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:27:21 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/25] Add perf support to the rockchip-dfi driver
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 03:40:34PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> I tested the series on RK3588 EVB1. The read/write byts looks
> sensible. Sometimes cycles reads unrealistic values, though:
>
> 18446744070475110400 rockchip_ddr/cycles/
I have seen this going off a few times with and without memory
pressure. If it's way off, it always seems to follow the same
pattern: The upper 32 bits are 0xffffffff instead of 0x00000000
with the lower 32 bits containing sensible data.
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists