[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YTea1LdPkcwPDw5wdvM+205k4eFfaM_DwhvGKB8rCn_Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 14:27:38 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 6/6] sched/fair: Implement starvation monitor
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:15 AM Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hey,
[..]
> > By postponing the enqueue/replanishment of the DL server here, we are fixing the
> > problem in a practical way, that works without breaking existing useful properties &
> > use-cases.
>
> In my understanding, if we simply postpone actual activation of the DL
> server up to the point it really needs to boost/run for giving CFS tasks
> some breath (the infamous 0-laxity :), we save RT tasks from useless
> interruptions and still can keep EDF/CBS working w/o much changes.
>
> It looks like a low hanging fruit, small improvement on what we have today
> than doesn't prevent us for implementing more complex features (i.e., full
> blown hierarchical scheduling, alternative schedulers) in the future if
> the need arises.
Agreed, thanks!
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists