[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaBtM8zzcdnXZH0pNFwTVOUPkUjfuahSJxgFRjcyDJ25A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:59:45 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...tq-group.com,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: introduce linux,use-rt-queue flag
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 9:30 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:37:08PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On the other hand I think the DT maintainers said it is basically fine
> > to use undocumented DT properties for this kind of thing. Having
> > completely undocumented DT properties might seem evil in another
> > sense, but I think Apple does nothing but...
>
> I don't don't know where you got that impression. I'm fine with them in
> the sense that I don't look at downstream and anything goes there.
No I was mistaken.
This was me misremembering that the "sloppy logic analyzer" from
Wolfram Sang was OK to merge without any proper bindings, but the
reason there was that this is for debugging only, but I don't know if
someone told him that or it's his own claim.
This is not for debugging only so it doesn't apply anyway.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists