[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74e31bff-81ed-44f5-9b38-8ee40822e833@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:21:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Revert "regulator: qcom-rpmh: Use
PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS"
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:35:08PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Super weird. I was hoping that something would jump out, but nothing
> does. :( I don't understand how lvs1 / lvs2 could have any impact on
> ldo12. :(
Does a device connected to some combination of these regulators have
power sequencing issues?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists