[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb17265969d1850462bd1d89df71d43f6d40967b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:33:46 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: wuyonggang001@...suo.com, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
kvalo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Remove unneeded variable
On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 13:52 +0800, wuyonggang001@...suo.com wrote:
> Fix the following coccicheck warning:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/debugfs.c:68:9-14: Unneeded
> variable: "count".
That may be a warning that it gives.
> Signed-off-by: Yonggang Wu <wuyonggang001@...suo.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/debugfs.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/debugfs.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/debugfs.c
> index 6b0e8d117061..55a067eaa52d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/debugfs.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static ssize_t tsf_read_file(struct b43legacy_wldev
> *dev, char *buf, size_t bufs
> (unsigned int)((tsf & 0xFFFFFFFF00000000ULL) >> 32),
> (unsigned int)(tsf & 0xFFFFFFFFULL));
>
> - return count;
> + return 0;
>
However, that doesn't even fix the warning, and it is actually also
completely wrong.
Please don't submit patches where you don't even understand the code.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists