[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <254fc651-aa75-074d-f567-49bafc437e9c@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:15:06 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, song@...nel.org
Cc: yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH -next v2 3/6] md: add a mutex to synchronize
idle and frozen in action_store()
Hi,
在 2023/06/13 22:43, Xiao Ni 写道:
>
> 在 2023/5/29 下午9:20, Yu Kuai 写道:
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>
>> Currently, for idle and frozen, action_store will hold 'reconfig_mutex'
>> and call md_reap_sync_thread() to stop sync thread, however, this will
>> cause deadlock (explained in the next patch). In order to fix the
>> problem, following patch will release 'reconfig_mutex' and wait on
>> 'resync_wait', like md_set_readonly() and do_md_stop() does.
>>
>> Consider that action_store() will set/clear 'MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN'
>> unconditionally, which might cause unexpected problems, for example,
>> frozen just set 'MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN' and is still in progress, while
>> 'idle' clear 'MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN' and new sync thread is started, which
>> might starve in progress frozen. A mutex is added to synchronize idle
>> and frozen from action_store().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/md.c | 5 +++++
>> drivers/md/md.h | 3 +++
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
>> index 23e8e7eae062..63a993b52cd7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
>> @@ -644,6 +644,7 @@ void mddev_init(struct mddev *mddev)
>> mutex_init(&mddev->open_mutex);
>> mutex_init(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
>> mutex_init(&mddev->delete_mutex);
>> + mutex_init(&mddev->sync_mutex);
>> mutex_init(&mddev->bitmap_info.mutex);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mddev->disks);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mddev->all_mddevs);
>> @@ -4785,14 +4786,18 @@ static void stop_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
>> static void idle_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
>> {
>> + mutex_lock(&mddev->sync_mutex);
>> clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
>> stop_sync_thread(mddev);
>> + mutex_unlock(&mddev->sync_mutex);
>> }
>> static void frozen_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
>> {
>> + mutex_init(&mddev->delete_mutex);
>
>
> typo error? It should be mutex_lock(&mddev->sync_mutex); ?
>
Yes, and thanks for spotting this, this looks like I did this while
rebasing.
Thanks,
Kuai
> Regards
>
> Xiao
>
>> set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
>> stop_sync_thread(mddev);
>> + mutex_unlock(&mddev->sync_mutex);
>> }
>> static ssize_t
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
>> index bfd2306bc750..2fa903de5bd0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/md.h
>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
>> @@ -537,6 +537,9 @@ struct mddev {
>> /* Protect the deleting list */
>> struct mutex delete_mutex;
>> + /* Used to synchronize idle and frozen for action_store() */
>> + struct mutex sync_mutex;
>> +
>> bool has_superblocks:1;
>> bool fail_last_dev:1;
>> bool serialize_policy:1;
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists