[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZImwRAuSXcVt3UPV@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:19:16 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE
Hi Raghavendra,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:28:51PM +0000, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> The series is based off of upstream v6.4-rc2, and applied David
> Matlack's common API for TLB invalidations[1] on top.
Sorry I didn't spot the dependency earlier, but this isn't helpful TBH.
David's series was partially applied, and what remains no longer cleanly
applies to the base you suggest. Independent of that, my *strong*
preference is that you just send out a series containing your patches as
well as David's. Coordinating dependent efforts is the only sane thing
to do. Also, those patches are 5 months old at this point which is
ancient history.
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230126184025.2294823-1-dmatlack@google.com/
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists