linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] CXL: Apply SRAT defined PXM to entire CFMWS window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6489c1ae90a38_142af82946c@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2023 06:33:34 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@...nel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] CXL: Apply SRAT defined PXM to entire CFMWS window

Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:32:40 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 09:35:23PM -0700, alison.schofield@...el.com wrote:
> > > The CXL subsystem requires the creation of NUMA nodes for CFMWS  
> > 
> > The thing is CXL some persistent memory thing, right? But what is this
> > CFMWS thing? I don't think I've ever seen that particular combination of
> > letters together.
> > 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> To save time before the US based folk wake up.
> 
[..]
> Note there is no requirement that the access characteristics of memory mapped
> into a given CFMWS should be remotely consistent across the whole window
>  - some of the window may route through switches, and to directly connected
>    devices.
> That's a simplifying assumption made today as we don't yet know the full
> scope of what people are building.
> 
> Hope that helps (rather than causing confusion!)

Thanks Jonathan! Patch 1 changelog also goes into more detail.