linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regmap: Check for register readability before checking cache during read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <168675046809.162502.15059417172912846988.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2023 14:47:48 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Check for register readability before checking
 cache during read

On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 21:07:16 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Ensure that we don't return a spurious cache hit for unreadable registers
> (eg, with the flat cache which doesn't understand sparseness) by checking
> for readability before we do a cache lookup.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regmap: Check for register readability before checking cache during read
      commit: eab5abdeb79f0f694c007c3a76a97902705c86f0

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark