[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZInInjGr6rufpC7u@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 16:03:10 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Use the correct type for memory allocation
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:30:28PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> get_elfcorehdr_size() returns a size_t, so there is no real point to
> store it in a u32.
>
> Turn 'alloc_size' into a size_t.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> Not sure if 'alloc_size' can overflow in real life application, but using
> the correct type looks harmless.
>
> Should it be a real fix, either:
> Fixes: 8cce437fbb5c ("s390/kdump: Fix elfcorehdr size calculation")
> or
> Fixes: 60a0c68df263 ("[S390] kdump backend code")
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c b/arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c
> index 8a617be28bb4..7af69948b290 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c
> @@ -568,9 +568,9 @@ static size_t get_elfcorehdr_size(int mem_chunk_cnt)
> int elfcorehdr_alloc(unsigned long long *addr, unsigned long long *size)
> {
> Elf64_Phdr *phdr_notes, *phdr_loads;
> + size_t alloc_size;
> int mem_chunk_cnt;
> void *ptr, *hdr;
> - u32 alloc_size;
> u64 hdr_off;
>
> /* If we are not in kdump or zfcp/nvme dump mode return */
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists