[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230615160446.60625339@xps-13>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:04:46 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: reset: at91-reset: use driver structure as
status parameter
Hi Sebastian,
sebastian.reichel@...labora.com wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2023 01:14:22
+0200:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 04:39:11PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > It is quite uncommon to use a driver helper with parameters like *pdev
> > and __iomem *base. It is much cleaner and close to today's standards to
> > provide the per-device driver structure and then access its
> > internals. Let's do this with at91_resete_status() before making more
> > modifications to this helper.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 5 ++---
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
> > index 741e44a017c3..a8a6f3997768 100644
> > --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
> > +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
> > @@ -149,11 +149,10 @@ static int at91_reset(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long mode,
> > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > }
> >
> > -static void __init at91_reset_status(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > - void __iomem *base)
> > +static void __init at91_reset_status(struct at91_reset *reset)
> > {
> > + u32 reg = readl(reset->rstc_base + AT91_RSTC_SR);
> > const char *reason;
> > - u32 reg = readl(base + AT91_RSTC_SR);
> >
> > switch ((reg & AT91_RSTC_RSTTYP) >> 8) {
> > case RESET_TYPE_GENERAL:
>
> You also need to update the code calling this functions, otherwise
> the series is not bisectable.
Of course, I was not paying enough attention here, sorry about that.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists