linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] zram: charge the compressed RAM to the page's memcgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACSyD1P19kxERKPUAVChjy7AzV6h6RKTV8252ntoK5EUy8uC2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:13:09 +0800
From:   贺中坤 <hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     minchan@...nel.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] zram: charge the compressed RAM to
 the page's memcgroup

>
> OK, also make sure that the zsmalloc support is implemented before zram
> depends on it.
>

OK. I got it.

>
> This is not really answering my question though. memcg under hard limit
> is not really my concern. This is a simpler case. I am not saying it
> doesn't need to get addresses but it is the memcg hard limited case that
> is much more interested. Because your charges are going to fail very
> likely and that would mean that swapout would fail AFAIU. If my
> understanding is wrong then it would really help to describe that case
> much more in the changelog.
>

OK, Got it. In many cases I have tested, it  will not fail because we did
not charge the page directly，but the objects(like  slab,compressed page),
for the zspage may be shared by any memcg.

> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs