linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-geni-qcom: correctly handle -EPROBE_DEFER from dma_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <168684070419.561998.2376284587741517242.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:51:44 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-geni-qcom: correctly handle -EPROBE_DEFER
 from dma_request_chan()

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:51:45 +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Now spi_geni_grab_gpi_chan() errors are correctly reported, the
> -EPROBE_DEFER error should be returned from probe in case the
> GPI dma driver is built as module and/or not probed yet.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-geni-qcom: correctly handle -EPROBE_DEFER from dma_request_chan()
      commit: 9d7054fb3ac2e8d252aae1268f20623f244e644f

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark