[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551145bb-18f7-45af-b75e-7caccca113bc@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 20:28:13 +0530
From: Prashanth K <quic_prashk@...cinc.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] usb: common: usb-conn-gpio: Set last role to unknown
before initial detection
On 15-06-23 08:06 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 07:52:32PM +0530, Prashanth K wrote:
>>
>> In that case, can I resubmit v1 of this patch again, where I have used a
>> macro in usb-conn-gpio driver ? something like this.
>>
>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>> #define USB_CONN_IRQF \
>> (IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT)
>>
>> +#define USB_ROLE_UNKNOWN (USB_ROLE_NONE -1)
>
> Are you referencing an existing enum here and assuming it is a specific
> value?
I' not assuming UBS_ROLE_NONE to be a specific value, but I want an
integer (for macro) which is not equal to USB_ROLE_NONE/DEVICE/HOST,
that's why I'm using (USB_ROLE_NONE - 1), assuming enumerators NONE,
DEVICE & HOST will be having adjacent integer values. Wouldn't that help?
Thanks,
Prashanth K
Powered by blists - more mailing lists