linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: fix connection reset due to tw hashdance race.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iK1yo6R4kZneD_1OZYocQCWp1sxviYzjJ+BBn4HeFSNhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:24:48 +0200
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     "Duan,Muquan" <duanmuquan@...du.com>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: fix connection reset due to tw hashdance race.

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 2:14 PM Duan,Muquan <duanmuquan@...du.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Eric,
>
> Could you please help check whether the following method makes sense, and
> any side effect? Thanks!
>
> If  do the tw hashdance in real TCP_TIME_WAIT state with substate
> TCP_TIME_WAIT, instead of in substate TCP_FIN_WAIT2, the connection
> refused issue will not occur. The race of the lookup process for the
> new SYN segment and the tw hashdance can come to the following
> results:
> 1) get tw sock, SYN segment will be accepted via TCP_TW_SYN.
> 2) fail to get tw sock and original sock, get a listener sock,
>    SYN segment will be accepted by listener sock.
> 3) get original sock, SYN segment can be discarded in further
> process after the sock is destroyed, in this case the peer will
> retransmit the SYN segment. This is a very rare case, seems no need to
> add lock for it.
>

You speak of SYN packet, while the original patch was all about FIN.

> I tested this modification in my reproducing environment,
> the connection reset issue did not occur and no performance impact
> observed.The side effect I currently can think out is that the original
> sock will live a little longer and hold some resources longer.
> The new patch is a temporary version which has a sysctl
> switch for comparing the 2 methods, and some modifications
> for statistics of the states not included.

So you are suggesting adding another hack/workaround for SYN packets,
on top of the other one ? What will follow next ?

Again, a correct fix needs to expand the scope of the ehash bucket lock.

I will handle this when time permits.