linux-kernel - Re: Regression: NULL pointer dereference after NFS_V4_2_READ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFX2JfnhOz+HiOd4vBwBK+5d19Kb8wfBNQhxRZHQoP8S2qiwFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:04:29 -0400
From:   Anna Schumaker <schumaker.anna@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
        linux-nfs <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Regression: NULL pointer dereference after NFS_V4_2_READ_PLUS
 (commit 7fd461c47)

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 9:01 AM Anna Schumaker <schumaker.anna@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 4:55 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 15/06/2023 10:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 14/06/2023 22:55, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> > >>>>> Still null ptr (built on 420b2d4 with your patch):
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We're through the merge window and at rc1 now, so I can spend more
> > >>>> time scratching my head over your bug again. We've come up with a
> > >>>> patch (attached) that adds a bunch of printks to show us what the
> > >>>> kernel thinks is going on. Do you mind trying it out and letting us
> > >>>> know what gets printed out? You'll need to make sure
> > >>>> CONFIG_NFS_V4_2_READ_PLUS is enabled when compiling the kernel.
> > >>>
> > >>> The patch does not apply. I tried: v6.4-rc1, v6.4-rc5, next-20230609.
> > >>
> > >> Can you try the attached patch on top of my 3-patch series from the
> > >> other day, and let me know what gets printed out? It adds a bunch of
> > >> printk()s at strategic points to print out what is going on with the
> > >> xdr scratch buffer since it's suddenly a bad memory address after
> > >> working for a bit on your machine.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Here you have entire log - attached (113 kB, I hope goes past mailing
> > > lists/spam filters).
> >
> > As expected this bounced from the mailing lists, but I hope you got it.
> > If not, let me know.
>
> I did still receive it. Thanks!

Can you swap out yesterday's patch with this patch? I've adjusted what
gets printed out, and added printk()s to xdr_copy_to_scratch().  I'm
starting to think that the xdr scratch buffer is fine, and that it's
the other pointer passed to memcpy() in that function that's the
problem, and the output from this patch will confirm for me.

Thanks,
Anna

>
> Anna
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >

View attachment "v2-0001-NFS-Add-debugging-printk-s-to-trace-the-xdr-scrat.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3404 bytes)