linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: example-schema: don't use enum as fallback, explain clock-names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:25:46 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: example-schema: don't use enum as fallback,
 explain clock-names


On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:26:11 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Compatibles with multiple entries should have usually only one fallback
> compatible thus enum followed by enum is not a common case.  Use 'const'
> as second compatible to show the recommended approach.
> 
> Explain also when clock-names are not really necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/example-schema.yaml | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Applied, thanks!