[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230615-bright-divided-2eb72872d7cc@spud>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 20:13:01 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>
Cc: tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, pratyush@...nel.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, git@....com, michael@...le.cc,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amitrkcian2002@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: jedec, spi-nor: Add DT property to
avoid setting SRWD bit in status register
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 04:46:48PM +0530, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:
> If the WP signal of the flash device is not connected and the software sets
> the status register write disable (SRWD) bit in the status register then
> thestatus register permanently becomes read-only. To avoid this added a new
> boolean DT property "broken-wp". If WP signal is not connected, then this
> property should be set in the DT to avoid setting the SRWD during status
> register write operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> index 89959e5c47ba..a509d34f14b2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> @@ -70,6 +70,19 @@ properties:
> be used on such systems, to denote the absence of a reliable reset
> mechanism.
>
> + broken-wp:
> + type: boolean
> + description:
> + The SRWD bit in status register, combined with the WP signal provides
Should the first use of SRWD be spelt out as you did in your commit
message?
> + The SRWD bit in status register, combined with the WP signal provides
^
nit: missing a comma here I think.
> + hardware data protection for the device. When the SRWD bit is set to 1,
> + and the WP signal is driven LOW, the status register nonvolatile bits
> + become read-only and the WRITE STATUS REGISTER operation will not execute.
> + The only way to exit this hardware-protected mode is to drive WP HIGH. But
> + if the WP signal of the flash device is not connected then status register
> + permanently becomes read-only as the SRWD bit cannot be reset. This boolean
> + flag can be used on such systems in which WP signal is not connected, to
nit: s/such//
Otherwise, seems reasonable to me & the detail in the description is
nice.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cheers,
Conor.
> + avoid setting the SRWD bit while writing the status register.
> +
> reset-gpios:
> description:
> A GPIO line connected to the RESET (active low) signal of the device.
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists