[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76b41825-30fa-b9e8-d043-2affcba24317@google.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/23] mips: update_mmu_cache() can replace
__update_tlb()
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:43:30PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > I do hope that you find the first fixes the breakage; but if not, then
>
> I hate to be the bearer of bad news but the first patch did not fix the
> breakage, I see the same issue.
Boo!
>
> > I even more fervently hope that the second will, despite my hating it.
> > Touch wood for the first, fingers crossed for the second, thanks,
>
> Thankfully, the second one does. Thanks for the quick and thoughtful
> responses!
Hurrah!
Thanks a lot, Nathan. I'll set aside my disappointment and curiosity,
clearly I'm not going to have much of a future as a MIPS programmer.
I must take a break, then rush Andrew the second patch, well, not
exactly that second patch, since most of that is revert: I'll just
send the few lines of replacement patch (with a new Subject line, as
update_mmu_cache() goes back to being separate from __update_tlb()).
Unless you object, I'll include a Tested-by: you. I realize that
your testing is limited to seeing it running; but that's true of
most of the testing at this stage - it gets to be more interesting
when the patch that adds the rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()
is added on top later.
Thanks again,
Hugh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists