| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpGA4Zy-NAsoFrs7R6MJDO0rW1R2gXCzoVkkcsUzfeXbzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:13:22 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lu Jialin <lujialin4@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] poll: Fix use-after-free in poll_freewait()
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 11:19 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:40 AM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 03:07:33PM +0800, Lu Jialin wrote:
> > > We found a UAF bug in remove_wait_queue as follows:
> > >
> > > ==================================================================
> > > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x71/0xe0
> > > Write of size 4 at addr ffff8881150d7b28 by task psi_trigger/15306
> > > Call Trace:
> > > dump_stack+0x9c/0xd3
> > > print_address_description.constprop.0+0x19/0x170
> > > __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84
> > > kasan_report+0x3a/0x50
> > > check_memory_region+0xfd/0x1f0
> > > _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x71/0xe0
> > > remove_wait_queue+0x26/0xc0
> > > poll_freewait+0x6b/0x120
> > > do_sys_poll+0x305/0x400
> > > do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
> > >
> > > Allocated by task 15306:
> > > kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40
> > > __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xb5/0xe0
> > > psi_trigger_create.part.0+0xfc/0x450
> > > cgroup_pressure_write+0xfc/0x3b0
> > > cgroup_file_write+0x1b3/0x390
> > > kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x224/0x2e0
> > > new_sync_write+0x2ac/0x3a0
> > > vfs_write+0x365/0x430
> > > ksys_write+0xd5/0x1b0
> > > do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
> > >
> > > Freed by task 15850:
> > > kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40
> > > kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30
> > > kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x40
> > > __kasan_slab_free+0x151/0x180
> > > kfree+0xba/0x680
> > > cgroup_file_release+0x5c/0xe0
> > > kernfs_drain_open_files+0x122/0x1e0
> > > kernfs_drain+0xff/0x1e0
> > > __kernfs_remove.part.0+0x1d1/0x3b0
> > > kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x89/0xf0
> > > cgroup_addrm_files+0x393/0x3d0
> > > css_clear_dir+0x8f/0x120
> > > kill_css+0x41/0xd0
> > > cgroup_destroy_locked+0x166/0x300
> > > cgroup_rmdir+0x37/0x140
> > > kernfs_iop_rmdir+0xbb/0xf0
> > > vfs_rmdir.part.0+0xa5/0x230
> > > do_rmdir+0x2e0/0x320
> > > __x64_sys_unlinkat+0x99/0xc0
> > > do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
> > > ==================================================================
> > >
> > > If using epoll(), wake_up_pollfree will empty waitqueue and set
> > > wait_queue_head is NULL before free waitqueue of psi trigger. But is
> > > doesn't work when using poll(), which will lead a UAF problem in
> > > poll_freewait coms as following:
> > >
> > > (cgroup_rmdir) |
> > > psi_trigger_destroy |
> > > wake_up_pollfree(&t->event_wait) |
> > > synchronize_rcu(); |
> > > kfree(t) |
> > > | (poll_freewait)
> > > | free_poll_entry(pwq->inline_entries + i)
> > > | remove_wait_queue(entry->wait_address)
> > > | spin_lock_irqsave(&wq_head->lock)
> > >
> > > entry->wait_address in poll_freewait() is t->event_wait in cgroup_rmdir().
> > > t->event_wait is free in psi_trigger_destroy before call poll_freewait(),
> > > therefore wq_head in poll_freewait() has been already freed, which would
> > > lead to a UAF.
Hi Lu,
Could you please share your reproducer along with the kernel config
you used? I'm trying to reproduce this UAF but every time I delete the
cgroup being polled, poll() simply returns POLLERR.
Thanks,
Suren.
> > >
> > > similar problem for epoll() has been fixed commit c2dbe32d5db5
> > > ("sched/psi: Fix use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue()").
> > > epoll wakeup function ep_poll_callback() will empty waitqueue and set
> > > wait_queue_head is NULL when pollflags is POLLFREE and judge pwq->whead
> > > is NULL or not before remove_wait_queue in ep_remove_wait_queue(),
> > > which will fix the UAF bug in ep_remove_wait_queue.
> > >
> > > But poll wakeup function pollwake() doesn't do that. To fix the
> > > problem, we empty waitqueue and set wait_address is NULL in pollwake() when
> > > key is POLLFREE. otherwise in remove_wait_queue, which is similar to
> > > epoll().
> > >
> > > Fixes: 0e94682b73bf ("psi: introduce psi monitor")
> > > Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJuCfpEoCRHkJF-=1Go9E94wchB4BzwQ1E3vHGWxNe+tEmSJoA@mail.gmail.com/#t
> > > Signed-off-by: Lu Jialin <lujialin4@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: correct commit msg and title suggested by Suren Baghdasaryan
> > > ---
> > > fs/select.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
> > > index 0ee55af1a55c..e64c7b4e9959 100644
> > > --- a/fs/select.c
> > > +++ b/fs/select.c
> > > @@ -132,7 +132,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(poll_initwait);
> > >
> > > static void free_poll_entry(struct poll_table_entry *entry)
> > > {
> > > - remove_wait_queue(entry->wait_address, &entry->wait);
> > > + wait_queue_head_t *whead;
> > > +
> > > + rcu_read_lock();
> > > + /* If it is cleared by POLLFREE, it should be rcu-safe.
> > > + * If we read NULL we need a barrier paired with smp_store_release()
> > > + * in pollwake().
> > > + */
> > > + whead = smp_load_acquire(&entry->wait_address);
> > > + if (whead)
> > > + remove_wait_queue(whead, &entry->wait);
> > > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > > fput(entry->filp);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -215,6 +225,14 @@ static int pollwake(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key
> > > entry = container_of(wait, struct poll_table_entry, wait);
> > > if (key && !(key_to_poll(key) & entry->key))
> > > return 0;
> > > + if (key_to_poll(key) & POLLFREE) {
> > > + list_del_init(&wait->entry);
> > > + /* wait_address !=NULL protects us from the race with
> > > + * poll_freewait().
> > > + */
> > > + smp_store_release(&entry->wait_address, NULL);
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > return __pollwake(wait, mode, sync, key);
> >
> > I don't understand why this patch is needed.
> >
> > The last time I looked at POLLFREE, it is only needed because of asynchronous
> > polls. See my explanation in the commit message of commit 50252e4b5e989ce6.
>
> Ah, I missed that. Thanks for the correction.
>
> >
> > In summary, POLLFREE solves the problem of polled waitqueues whose lifetime is
> > tied to the current task rather than to the file being polled. Also refer to
> > the comment above wake_up_pollfree(), which mentions this.
> >
> > fs/select.c is synchronous polling, not asynchronous. Therefore, it should not
> > need to handle POLLFREE.
> >
> > If there's actually a bug here, most likely it's a bug in psi_trigger_poll()
> > where it is using a waitqueue whose lifetime is tied to neither the current task
> > nor the file being polled. That needs to be fixed.
>
> Yeah. We discussed this issue in
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJuCfpFb0J5ZwO6kncjRG0_4jQLXUy-_dicpH5uGiWP8aKYEJQ@mail.gmail.com
> and the root cause is that cgroup_file_release() where
> psi_trigger_destroy() is called is not tied to the cgroup file's real
> lifetime (see my analysis here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJuCfpFZ3B4530TgsSHqp5F_gwfrDujwRYewKReJru==MdEHQg@mail.gmail.com/#t).
> I guess it's time to do a deeper surgery and figure out a way to call
> psi_trigger_destroy() when the polled cgroup file is actually being
> destroyed. I'll take a closer look into this later today.
> A fix will likely require some cgroup or kernfs code changes, so
> CC'ing Tejun for visibility.
> Thanks,
> Suren.
>
> >
> > - Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists