| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:31:07 +0530
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@...il.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Calculate the scan depth for idle
balance based on system utilization
Hello Chen Yu,
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:18:57AM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> When CPU is about to enter idle, it invokes newidle_balance() to pull
> some tasks from other runqueues. Although there is per domain
> max_newidle_lb_cost to throttle the newidle_balance(), it would be
> good to further limit the scan based on overall system utilization.
> The reason is that there is no limitation for newidle_balance() to
> launch this balance simultaneously on multiple CPUs. Since each
> newidle_balance() has to traverse all the CPUs to calculate the
> statistics one by one, this total time cost on newidle_balance()
> could be O(n^2). This is not good for performance or power saving.
>
> For example, sqlite has spent quite some time on newidle balance()
> on Intel Sapphire Rapids, which has 2 x 56C/112T = 224 CPUs:
> 6.69% 0.09% sqlite3 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] newidle_balance
> 5.39% 4.71% sqlite3 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] update_sd_lb_stats
>
> Based on this observation, limit the scan depth of newidle_balance()
> by considering the utilization of the LLC domain. Let the number of
> scanned groups be a linear function of the utilization ratio:
>
Is there any particular reason why this is being limited only to the
LLC domain ?
On architectures where the LLC domain may not be so large (POWER9/10,
AMD), the additional cost is usually paid at the higher domains where
the number of groups is greater / equal to the number of groups in the
LLC domain and where sd_span is pretty large. It would be good to
explore avoiding the scan cost on those domains as well, right?
> nr_groups_to_scan = nr_groups * (1 - util_ratio)
If we can extend this logic to higher domains, on a Zen3 1 Socket
server with 128 CPUs at the DIE domain containing 8 groups, we can
expect a significant reduction in the time spent doing
update_sg_lb_stats() at higher utilizations.
util_ratio nr_groups_to_scan nr_cpus_scanned
========================================================
0.9 1 16 (-87.5%)
0.75 2 32 (-75%)
0.5 4 64 (-50%)
0.25 6 96 (-25%)
0.1 7 112 (-12.5%)
On a Zen 4 1 socket server with 192 CPUs at the DIE domain containing
12 groups, values will be:
util_ratio nr_groups_to_scan nr_cpus_scanned
========================================================
0.9 1 16 (-91%)
0.75 3 48 (-75%)
0.5 6 96 (-50%)
0.25 9 144 (-25%)
0.1 10 160 (-16.7%)
>
> Besides, save the total_load, total_capacity of the current
> sched domain in each periodic load balance. This statistic
> can be reused later by CPU_NEWLY_IDLE load balance if it quits
> the scan earlier. Introduce a sched feature ILB_UTIL to
> control this.
>
> Suggested-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched/topology.h | 4 ++++
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/sched/features.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> index 1faececd5694..d7b2bac9bdf3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> @@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ struct sched_domain_shared {
> atomic_t nr_busy_cpus;
> int has_idle_cores;
> int nr_idle_scan;
> + /* ilb scan depth and load balance statistic snapshot */
> + int ilb_nr_scan;
> + unsigned long ilb_total_load;
> + unsigned long ilb_total_capacity;
> };
>
> struct sched_domain {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index b3a24aead848..f999e838114e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -10122,6 +10122,39 @@ static void update_idle_cpu_scan(struct lb_env *env,
> WRITE_ONCE(sd_share->nr_idle_scan, (int)y);
> }
>
> +static void update_ilb_group_scan(struct lb_env *env,
> + unsigned long sum_util,
> + struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share,
> + struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
> +{
> + u64 tmp, nr_scan;
> +
> + if (!sched_feat(ILB_UTIL) || env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!sd_share)
> + return;
> + /*
> + * Limit the newidle balance scan depth based on overall system
> + * utilization:
> + * nr_groups_scan = nr_groups * (1 - util_ratio)
> + * and util_ratio = sum_util / (sd_weight * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
> + */
> + nr_scan = env->sd->nr_groups * sum_util;
> + tmp = env->sd->span_weight * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> + do_div(nr_scan, tmp);
> + nr_scan = env->sd->nr_groups - nr_scan;
> + if ((int)nr_scan != sd_share->ilb_nr_scan)
> + WRITE_ONCE(sd_share->ilb_nr_scan, (int)nr_scan);
> +
> + /* Also save the statistic snapshot of the periodic load balance */
> + if (sds->total_load != sd_share->ilb_total_load)
> + WRITE_ONCE(sd_share->ilb_total_load, sds->total_load);
> +
> + if (sds->total_capacity != sd_share->ilb_total_capacity)
> + WRITE_ONCE(sd_share->ilb_total_capacity, sds->total_capacity);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * update_sd_lb_stats - Update sched_domain's statistics for load balancing.
> * @env: The load balancing environment.
> @@ -10200,6 +10233,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
> }
>
> update_idle_cpu_scan(env, sum_util, sd_share);
> + update_ilb_group_scan(env, sum_util, sd_share, sds);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
> index ee7f23c76bd3..8f6e5b08408d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/features.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(RT_PUSH_IPI, true)
>
> SCHED_FEAT(RT_RUNTIME_SHARE, false)
> SCHED_FEAT(LB_MIN, false)
> +SCHED_FEAT(ILB_UTIL, true)
> SCHED_FEAT(ATTACH_AGE_LOAD, true)
>
> SCHED_FEAT(WA_IDLE, true)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists