linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpio: aggregator: Incorporate gpio-delay functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 12:10:26 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpio: aggregator: Incorporate gpio-delay functionality

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 2:14 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> The newly appeared gpio-delay module enables external signal delay lines
> that may be connected to the GPIOs. But at the same time it copies the
> GPIO forwarder functionality. Besides that the approach does not scale.
> If we would have another external component, we would need yet another
> driver. That's why I think, and seems others support me, better to
> enable such a functionality inside GPIO aggregator driver.
>
> Patch 1 is a cleanup that may be applied independently on the decision
> about the rest.
>
> Please, test and comment!

Alexander, I have slightly changed the code, can you test this and
give your formal Tested-by tag?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko