[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <015062b6-2d4a-7b91-8f64-1695f526f794@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:48:34 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: "Kasireddy, Vivek" <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: "Hocko, Michal" <mhocko@...e.com>,
"jmarchan@...hat.com" <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
"Kim, Dongwon" <dongwon.kim@...el.com>,
"Chang, Junxiao" <junxiao.chang@...el.com>,
"muchun.song@...ux.dev" <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udmabuf: revert 'Add support for mapping hugepages (v4)'
>> Skimming over at shmem_read_mapping_page() users, I assume most of
>> them
>> use a VM_PFNMAP mapping (or don't mmap them at all), where we won't be
>> messing with the struct page at all.
>>
>> (That might even allow you to mmap hugetlb sub-pages, because the struct
>> page -- and mapcount -- will be ignored completely and not touched.)
> Oh, are you suggesting that if we do vma->vm_flags |= VM_PFNMAP
> in the mmap handler (mmap_udmabuf) and also do
> vmf_insert_pfn(vma, vmf->address, page_to_pfn(page))
> instead of
> vmf->page = ubuf->pages[pgoff];
> get_page(vmf->page);
>
> in the vma fault handler (udmabuf_vm_fault), we can avoid most of the
> pitfalls you have identified -- including with the usage of hugetlb subpages?
Yes, that's my thinking, but I have to do my homework first to see if
that would really work for hugetlb.
The thing is, I kind-of consider what udmabuf does a layer violation: we
have a filesystem (shmem/hugetlb) that should handle mappings to user
space. Yet, a driver decides to bypass that and simply map the pages
ordinarily to user space. (revealed by the fact that hugetlb does never
map sub-pages but udmabuf decides to do so)
In an ideal world everybody would simply mmap() the original memfd, but
thinking about offset+size configuration within the memfd that might not
always be desirable. As a workaround, we could mmap() only the PFNs,
leaving the struct page unaffected.
I'll have to look closer into that.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists