[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb130fd5-7134-444b-a79c-658bff30c588@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 12:19:29 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Aishwarya.TCV@....com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config
fragments for test runs
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 09:26:39AM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 03:19:12PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> > >> The RFC is for discussion on folder placement and file naming etc.
> I am wandering if we can put these configurations into kselftest (the
> folder tools/testing/selftests/). You could see now kernel build has
> already provided option to merge kernel configurations for kselftests.
Well, it'd be nice if the whole thing was a kselftest rather than it's
own thing, that'd avoid the need for custom setup to run the tests. But
while it's not a kselftest it's not clear to me that it's a good fit.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists