linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.3 11/19] media: cec: core: don't set last

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230615113719.648862-11-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 07:37:11 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.3 11/19] media: cec: core: don't set last_initiator if tx in progress

From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>

[ Upstream commit 73af6c7511038249cad3d5f3b44bf8d78ac0f499 ]

When a message was received the last_initiator is set to 0xff.
This will force the signal free time for the next transmit
to that for a new initiator. However, if a new transmit is
already in progress, then don't set last_initiator, since
that's the initiator of the current transmit. Overwriting
this would cause the signal free time of a following transmit
to be that of the new initiator instead of a next transmit.

Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c
index ac18707fddcd2..b1512f9c5895c 100644
--- a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c
+++ b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c
@@ -1090,7 +1090,8 @@ void cec_received_msg_ts(struct cec_adapter *adap,
 	mutex_lock(&adap->lock);
 	dprintk(2, "%s: %*ph\n", __func__, msg->len, msg->msg);
 
-	adap->last_initiator = 0xff;
+	if (!adap->transmit_in_progress)
+		adap->last_initiator = 0xff;
 
 	/* Check if this message was for us (directed or broadcast). */
 	if (!cec_msg_is_broadcast(msg))
-- 
2.39.2