linux-kernel - Re: Closing down the wireless trees for a summer break?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sfasgb2f.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:32:56 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Closing down the wireless trees for a summer break?

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:

> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 18:07:43 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
>> But do note that above is _only_ for -next patches. For patches going to
>> -rc releases we apply the patches directly to wireless, no other trees
>> are involved. My proposal was that net maintainers would take only fixes
>> for -rc releases, my guess from history is that it would be maximum of
>> 10-15 patches. And once me and Johannes are back we would sort out -next
>> patches before the merge window. But of course you guys can do whatever
>> you think is best :)
>
> Ah, good note, I would have guessed that fixes go via special trees,
> too. In that case it should indeed be easy. We'll just look out for
> maintainer acks on the list and ping people if in doubt.

SGTM! :)

-Toke