linux-kernel - [PATCH] genirq: Fix nested thread vs synchronize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230613-genirq-nested-v1-1-289dc15b7669@axis.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:11:57 +0200
From:   Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...s.com>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Fix nested thread vs synchronize_hardirq()
 deadlock

There is a possibility of deadlock if synchronize_hardirq() is called
when the nested threaded interrupt is active.  The following scenario
was observed on a uniprocessor PREEMPT_NONE system:

 Thread 1                      Thread 2

 handle_nested_thread()
  Set INPROGRESS
  Call ->thread_fn()
   thread_fn goes to sleep

                              free_irq()
                               __synchronize_hardirq()
                                Busy-loop forever waiting for INPROGRESS
                                to be cleared

Since the purpose of the INPROGRESS flag seems to be for hard IRQ
handlers, remove its usage in the nested threaded interrupt case and
instead re-use the active_threads mechanism to wait for nested threaded
interrupts to complete.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
---
 kernel/irq/chip.c   | 5 +++--
 kernel/irq/manage.c | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index 49e7bc871fece..3e4b4c6de8195 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
 	}
 
 	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
-	irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS);
+	atomic_inc(&desc->threads_active);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
 
 	action_ret = IRQ_NONE;
@@ -487,7 +487,8 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
 		note_interrupt(desc, action_ret);
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
-	irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&desc->threads_active))
+		wake_up(&desc->wait_for_threads);
 
 out_unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index d2742af0f0fd8..58dcc9df6d72c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1977,6 +1977,10 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, void *dev_id)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* Wait for any remaining nested threaded interrupts. */
+	wait_event(desc->wait_for_threads,
+		   !atomic_read(&desc->threads_active));
+
 	/* Last action releases resources */
 	if (!desc->action) {
 		/*

---
base-commit: 858fd168a95c5b9669aac8db6c14a9aeab446375
change-id: 20230613-genirq-nested-625612a6fa05

Best regards,
-- 
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>