linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Change CPTS clock parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 18:59:54 +0530
From:   Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
To:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>
CC:     Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, <nm@...com>,
        <kristo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Change CPTS clock parent

Hi Neha Malcom Francis,

On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:34:43 +0530, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
> MAIN_PLL0 has a flag set in DM (Device Manager) that removes it's
> capability to re-initialise clock frequencies. CPTS and RGMII has
> MAIN_PLL3 as their parent which does not have this flag. While RGMII
> needs this reinitialisation to default frequency to be able to get
> 250MHz with its divider, CPTS can not get its required 200MHz with its
> divider. Thus, move CPTS clock parent on J721S2 from MAIN_PLL3_HSDIV1 to
> MAIN_PLL0_HSDIV6.
> 
> [...]

I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1].
Thank you!

[1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Change CPTS clock parent
      commit: 1f36d0e8be3ae7717c801e954275fba6247b2f46

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Vignesh