lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230615124558.2cea58b3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 12:45:58 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Christoffer Dall <cdall@...columbia.edu>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c

between commit:

  6e13b6b923b3 ("arm64: kaslr: split kaslr/module initialization")
  e46b7103aef3 ("arm64: module: move module randomization to module.c")

from the arm64 tree and commit:

  0ddc312b7c73 ("arm64: Turn kaslr_feature_override into a generic SW feature override")

from the kvm-arm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is
now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c
index 17f96a19781d,5d4ce7f5f157..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c
@@@ -4,33 -4,46 +4,33 @@@
   */
  
  #include <linux/cache.h>
 -#include <linux/crc32.h>
  #include <linux/init.h>
 -#include <linux/libfdt.h>
 -#include <linux/mm_types.h>
 -#include <linux/sched.h>
 -#include <linux/types.h>
 -#include <linux/pgtable.h>
 -#include <linux/random.h>
 +#include <linux/printk.h>
  
 -#include <asm/fixmap.h>
 -#include <asm/kernel-pgtable.h>
 +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
  #include <asm/memory.h>
 -#include <asm/mmu.h>
 -#include <asm/sections.h>
 -#include <asm/setup.h>
  
 -u64 __ro_after_init module_alloc_base;
  u16 __initdata memstart_offset_seed;
  
- struct arm64_ftr_override kaslr_feature_override __initdata;
- 
 -static int __init kaslr_init(void)
 +bool __ro_after_init __kaslr_is_enabled = false;
 +
 +void __init kaslr_init(void)
  {
- 	if (kaslr_feature_override.val & kaslr_feature_override.mask & 0xf) {
 -	u64 module_range;
 -	u32 seed;
 -
 -	/*
 -	 * Set a reasonable default for module_alloc_base in case
 -	 * we end up running with module randomization disabled.
 -	 */
 -	module_alloc_base = (u64)_etext - MODULES_VSIZE;
 -
+ 	if (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(arm64_sw_feature_override.val &
+ 						 arm64_sw_feature_override.mask,
+ 						 ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_NOKASLR)) {
  		pr_info("KASLR disabled on command line\n");
 -		return 0;
 +		return;
  	}
  
 -	if (!kaslr_enabled()) {
 +	/*
 +	 * The KASLR offset modulo MIN_KIMG_ALIGN is taken from the physical
 +	 * placement of the image rather than from the seed, so a displacement
 +	 * of less than MIN_KIMG_ALIGN means that no seed was provided.
 +	 */
 +	if (kaslr_offset() < MIN_KIMG_ALIGN) {
  		pr_warn("KASLR disabled due to lack of seed\n");
 -		return 0;
 +		return;
  	}
  
  	pr_info("KASLR enabled\n");

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ